Leetcode problem 11 - Container With Most Water | Problem and solution
Container With Most Water
Description
You are given an integer array height of length n. There are n vertical lines drawn such that the two endpoints of the ith line are (i, 0) and (i, height[i]).
Find two lines that together with the x-axis form a container, such that the container contains the most water.
Return the maximum amount of water a container can store.
Notice that you may not slant the container.
Example 1:
1
2
3
Input: height = [1,8,6,2,5,4,8,3,7]
Output: 49
Explanation: The above vertical lines are represented by array [1,8,6,2,5,4,8,3,7]. In this case, the max area of water (blue section) the container can contain is 49.
Example 2:
1
2
Input: height = [1,1]
Output: 1
Initial Thoughts
At first glance, a brute-force approach seems natural — try every pair of lines, calculate the water they can hold, and keep track of the maximum.
However, a smarter approach exists that saves time by using the two-pointer technique.
Let’s explore both.
1. Brute Force Approach (Simple but Inefficient)
We try every possible pair of lines and compute the area between them.
Java Code:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
class Solution {
public int maxArea(int[] height) {
int maxArea = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < height.length; i++) {
for (int j = i + 1; j < height.length; j++) {
int area = (j - i) * Math.min(height[i], height[j]);
maxArea = Math.max(maxArea, area);
}
}
return maxArea;
}
}
- Time Complexity: O(n²)
- Space Complexity: O(1)
This approach works but is too slow for large input sizes.
2. Optimized Approach (Two Pointers)
Instead of trying all pairs, we can be smarter:
Start with two pointers, one at the beginning and one at the end.
Calculate the area between them.
Move the pointer pointing to the shorter line inward — hoping to find a taller line that can create a larger container.
Intuition: The area is limited by the shorter line. Moving the taller line inward won’t help — we must move the shorter side to potentially find a larger area.
Java Code:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
class Solution {
public int maxArea(int[] height) {
int left = 0;
int right = height.length - 1;
int maxArea = 0;
while (left < right) {
int width = right - left;
int area = Math.min(height[left], height[right]) * width;
maxArea = Math.max(maxArea, area);
// Move the pointer at the shorter line
if (height[left] < height[right]) {
left++;
} else {
right--;
}
}
return maxArea;
}
}
- Time Complexity: O(n)
- Space Complexity: O(1)
Using two pointers cuts the time complexity dramatically, making this solution efficient even for large arrays.
Step-by-Step Algorithm
- Initialize:
-
left = 0, pointing to the first line.
-
right = n - 1, pointing to the last line.
-
maxArea = 0.
- Loop while left < right:
-
Calculate the width: right - left.
-
Calculate the current area: min(height[left], height[right]) * width.
-
Update maxArea if the current area is larger.
-
Move the pointer pointing to the shorter line:
-
If height[left] < height[right], move left++.
-
Else, move right–.
-
- Return the maxArea.
Why This Works
At each step, we are trying to maximize the area:
-
The width decreases as we move pointers inward.
-
To compensate for the smaller width, we need taller lines.
-
Hence, moving the shorter line inward increases our chances of finding a better container.
This greedy approach ensures we never miss the best possible solution.
Conclusion
The Container With Most Water problem is a great example of how moving beyond brute force and thinking carefully about the problem’s properties can lead to a much more efficient solution.
-
Start simple with brute-force to understand the mechanics.
-
Then optimize using two pointers to drastically improve performance.